Home/Blog/Conversion
Conversion2024-12-158 min read

Why Your Pine Script Strategy Won't Work Directly as an EA (And How to Fix It)

The Fundamental Differences

TradingView's Pine Script and MetaTrader's MQL4/MQL5 were designed with completely different philosophies. Understanding these differences is crucial before attempting any conversion.

Pine Script is a domain-specific language designed for rapid strategy prototyping and indicator creation. It abstracts away most of the complexity of market data handling and order execution, making it easy for traders to test ideas quickly.

MQL4/MQL5, on the other hand, gives you direct access to the trading platform's internals. This power comes with responsibility - you need to handle things that Pine Script does automatically.

Execution Model

One of the biggest differences is how code executes:

Pine Script

  • Runs once per bar close (by default)
  • Has access to all historical data at once
  • Can "look ahead" in backtests (dangerous!)
  • Repainting is common if not careful
  • MQL4/MQL5

  • Runs on every tick in real-time
  • Must explicitly request historical data
  • No future data access (more realistic)
  • Handles real-time price updates
  • Key Issue: A strategy that "works" in Pine Script backtests might fail in live MQL trading because of these execution differences.

    Data Access

    Pine Script

    ``pine // Simple indicator access rsi = ta.rsi(close, 14) sma = ta.sma(close, 20) `

    MQL4

    `mql4 // More explicit data handling double rsi = iRSI(Symbol(), Period(), 14, PRICE_CLOSE, 0); double sma = iMA(Symbol(), Period(), 20, 0, MODE_SMA, PRICE_CLOSE, 0); ``

    The MQL approach requires more code but gives you finer control over buffer management and multi-timeframe access.

    Order Management

    This is where the biggest differences lie:

    Pine Script

    ``pine if buyCondition strategy.entry("Long", strategy.long) strategy.exit("Exit", "Long", profit=100, loss=50) ``

    In MQL, you need to handle slippage settings, error checking, order modification (SL/TP can't always be set on entry), position tracking, partial closes, and multiple orders per strategy.

    What Needs to Change

    When converting your Pine Script strategy to MQL, expect to:

  • 1. Rewrite indicator access - MQL uses handles and buffers
  • 2. Add error handling - Every order operation can fail
  • 3. Implement tick handling - Decide when to check for signals
  • 4. Build position management - Track your own orders
  • 5. Handle partial fills - MQL shows the real market
  • 6. Add proper logging - Debug issues in live trading
  • 7. Consider spread and slippage - Real trading costs
  • Conclusion

    Converting Pine Script to MQL isn't just "translating" code - it's rebuilding your strategy for a different trading environment. The good news is that strategies that survive this process tend to be more robust and realistic.

    Our recommendation: Before converting, make sure your Pine Script strategy doesn't rely on repainting indicators, uses realistic spread/commission settings, has proper risk management, and shows consistent results across different time periods.

    Need help with your conversion? Get a free strategy audit or contact us to discuss your project.

    🧑‍💻

    TradeMetrics Pro Team

    Expert EA developers with 10+ years of experience in automated trading systems.

    Need Help With Your EA Project?

    Get expert assistance with strategy conversion, EA development, or optimization.